(from https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-artworks-untitled)
". . . Philosophical reasons aside, it’s not practical to leave an artwork untitled. Keeping track of untitled works can be a logistical nightmare for gallerists and cataloguers, and psychology studies have suggested that viewers both pay less attention to and have a lower understanding of artworks that are untitled. Still, “Untitled” has become so pervasive, it functions as a title in and of itself—and a charged one. The word can subtly jab at the institutional framework of museums and galleries, emphasize an abstractionist’s evasion of representation, or offer a blank space for the viewer to come up with their own interpretation of a work. . . Sometimes, “Untitled” is simply a relic of a bygone past—before titling became common practice. In her book Picture Titles: How and Why Western Paintings Acquired Their Names (2015), Ruth Yeazell, a professor of English at Yale University, explains that in pre-18th-century Europe, artists did not need to title their work because most art stayed in one place. . ."
What do you think? Tell me at
https://rayjozwiak.com/contact
Visit Ray Jozwiak at:
Website - https://rayjozwiak.com
Apple ITunes - https://itunes.apple.com/ke/ artist/ray-jozwiak/4343853
Amazon - https://www.amazon.com/s?k= ray+jozwiak&ref=nb_sb_noss