(from John Shelby Spong.com)
"We reference Jesus because he is the life in which this God experience has come to us. It is only institutional religion that interprets this experience as a solitary one. Jesus is the way to God for me, but I will never say that he is the only way to God. That would be to claim more than I am competent to claim. I cannot force the Holy God to live within the boundaries of my limited understanding of the holy. That would be to claim that I can embrace all that is God inside the finite limits of my human(ity).
A great debate has gone on in Christian history for centuries as to whether Jesus is different from you or me in substance or in degree. The majority opinion in “orthodox” Christian circles maintains that he is different in substance and creeds and doctrinal statements make that assumption. There has, however, always been a minority opinion, an undercurrent flowing in Christian history that asserts that this difference is only in degree. I can locate that in the 14th century writing of Meister Eckhart, who succeeded Thomas Aquinas in his theological chair. I find it present in my great mentor, John A. T. Robinson, particularly in his book, The Human Face of God. I find that position persuasive for if God is one, and if God is real, then the God experienced in Jesus has to be the same as the God experienced in everyone else, and if the humanity of Jesus is real, then it has to be the same humanity that you and I possess. Jesus becomes, thus, the defining life, that is, Jesus is the life through which God has been met and engaged in a full and special way. That is a difference in degree not in kind.
I do meet God in the lives of those you mention and in many others, but I recognize that God because that is the same God I believe I meet in Jesus of Nazareth."
What do YOU think?
http://www.rayjozwiak.com/guestbook.html
Download your
very own copy of
ANOTHER SHOT
by Ray Jozwiak
Please Visit
http://www.rayjozwiak.com
Tweet
